Talk:Afferentur regi

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Discography

Thank you for drafting the page of this motet of the composer.

For the discography, a critical review of the available performances of Bruckner's Locus iste has been made by Hans Roelofs. See Critical review of about 30 recordings of Afferentur regi. According to Roelofs, the better recordings are those by Ferguson, Halsey, Rademann und Stenlund. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 13:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unjustified removal?

I had replaced "alone found in a monastic archive" by "alone found in the archive of Stift Kresmünster". Stift Kremsmünster (monastery of Kremsmünster) is the monastery in which it was found. Please justify why this precision was removed. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 17:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Meneerke. I wanted to get an opportunity to verify the name in the source that was already cited, as I recalled a different name being used. The one used in the cited source is "monastery at Kremsmünster" (ie. Kremsmünster Abbey). I suspect either the source you used or the transcription was in error, but without the source to hand I cannot tell which. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake is always possible. There was indeed a typo (Kresmünster instead of Kremsmünster). If you have doubts, please refrain of removing the info, but ask for further explanation or possible translation. In van Zwol's anthology (2012) locations, religious feasts, etc. are in German (i.e., the native language of Austria). Stift is the German word for "Abbey" or "Monastery" (e.g., Stift Sankt Florian = St. Florian Monastery). In the future I will try to find an Anglicised term for them. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 21:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better not to leave mistakes in the article, I would imagine. Thank you for agreeing to take a different approach in future. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]